Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not that I have anything against salesmen,
but let me you something
See, I was born with a in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, Dead-Dog records. If it ain't a Dead-Dog, it barking.
How can I ya?

There are fifty-million blank cassettes a sold in this country,
and me, they're not being used for dictation.
They're being to copy records. There is no expemption of copyright
for home taping, period, the consent of the owner.

going on anyways?
What comes out of the is different
than goes in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The important things about the invention of tape
is that it changed music being an event in time,
into an event in space.

The relationship between a and an original
...into being an in space.

I think it challanges we have about
the relationship a copy and an original

You can edit it, the songs.
And of course when it's played back,

You're dealing in the sense
In the same you're dealing with any plastic material
And ofcourse, when it's played back,
it once again becomes an in time.

But that intrum
(I suppose)
But during that intrum period, where it's a thing,
you can do of things with it.
Lots of that you never had available
Prior to -, to -, Prior to -,
The of tape.

It took while (seeing) before started
seeing the possibilities of
seeing the of this

What's the power of reproducing
back into our own
the old boundaries between what was my information
And what was
Have confused.

Only a

And instead of making their own
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do anything you)

Only a

Old technologies get confused with new

I this confusing between original and copy,
and all the new technology use information

A sound...
Allow you to something,
You
And put it into own music
So when you a certain key,
You
A sound from else's recording

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
from somebody else's
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it your own music.
Somebody recording.
A sound somebody else.

Ownership is
the older system of distribution.

By the way, I don't know how many I've made
the refrence to the U.S. Copyright Law

?'s law was written in 1924.
It was ammended in 1988.
But the roots of the law back century

Just to put it in context, pre-radio, really,
it's pre-commercial-radio, pre-television,
certainly pre-computer, it's geared, ah...
It's records, it's pre-compact-disk.
It's pre-almost everything come to look at
in life as communicating information.
One of the major criticizems of a legal stuctured in this way
is that it does copyright law into disrespect, and it
law generally into disrespect. If one has a system which makes
common activities wrong in the eyes of the law, and yet
is doing it - then you begin to wonder - is law worthy of

(You something?)
Everything it is appealing
(You something?)
the traffic will allow
(The who were listening)
No-way can you get happy feeling
(You and daughter)
you are stealing
(You don't any of this. Just look around.
Just ask around. Just see what they're tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of that of thing.
(The country knows happening. Look, oh)

I still feel
I still feel
I still feel stolen are stolen goods,
go on with the stealing...
But I really comment on it,
I keep feeling like,
but... but... but...
As as you accept stolem goods
As as you accept an art form like stolen goods
I suppose,
As long as you an art form like Collage,
Where you take and newspaper clippings
and them up on a board.

I say.
I say that the out there,
When know that there's another side to this issue,
When know that people like myself,
let me interrupt myself.

How am I going to make a
I hope you find what you are for.
On the hand,
In fact, the of this case is wether
or not artists can feel to use work done by artists of
own generation, or preceeding generations
as the for the creation of new work
again something that has taken place in art,
from time and memorial, and continue to happen.
And if the courts say that a of art can have no basis
in a prior work of art, would be a very damaging and destructive
statement in to
the of art.

Oh, don't sue us!