Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not that I have anything against salesmen,
but let me you something
See, I was born a song in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, records. If it ain't a Dead-Dog, it ain't barking.
How can I ya?

There are fifty-million blank cassettes a year sold in country,
and believe me, not being used for dictation.
They're being used to copy records. is no expemption of copyright
for home taping, period, without the of the owner.

What's on anyways?
What comes out of the is different
than what in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most important about the invention of tape
is that it changed music being an event in time,
being an event in space.

The relationship a copy and an original
...into an event in space.

I think it challanges notions we have
the between a copy and an original

You can it, strech the songs.
And of then when it's played back,

You're dealing in the sense
In the same you're dealing with any plastic material
And ofcourse, then when played back,
it once again becomes an in time.

But during that
(I suppose)
But during intrum period, where it's a spacial thing,
you can do of things with it.
of things that you never had available
Prior to -, to -, Prior to -,
The of tape.

It while (seeing) before anybody started
the possibilities of this
seeing the possibilities of

the power of reproducing information
back into our own
That the old boundaries between what was my
And was yours
Have confused.

a sample

And instead of their own sounds
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do than you)

Only a

Old technologies get confused new ones

I find confusing between original and copy,
and all the new technology use information

A sound...
Allow you to something,
You
And put it your own music
So when you a certain key,
You
A sound from somebody else's

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
from somebody recording
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it into own music.
else's recording.
A sound somebody else.

Ownership is
Destabilizes the older of distribution.

By the way, I don't know how many times made
the refrence to the U.S. Copyright Law

?'s law was written in 1924.
It was ammended in 1988.
But the roots of the law back 18th

to put it in context, it's pre-radio, really,
it's pre-commercial-radio, pre-television,
certainly pre-computer, it's geared, ah...
It's pre-modern records, pre-compact-disk.
It's pre-almost everything we've come to at
in modern life as information.
One of the criticizems of a legal system stuctured in this way
is that it bring copyright law into disrespect, and it
bring law generally disrespect. If one has a system which makes
common wrong in the eyes of the law, and yet everybody
is doing it - you begin to wonder - is law worthy of respect?

(You something?)
Everything about it is
(You something?)
Everything the traffic allow
(The who were listening)
No-way can you get that happy
(You and daughter)
you are stealing
(You don't need any of this. look around.
Just ask around. Just see what they're tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of that of thing.
(The country knows happening. Look, oh)

I still feel
I still stolen
I still stolen goods are stolen goods,
go on with the stealing...
But I really comment on it,
'cause I keep like,
but... but... but...
As long as you accept goods
As as you accept an art form like stolen goods
I suppose,
As long as you accept an art form Collage,
you take photographs and newspaper clippings
and draw up on a board.

I say.
I say that the out there,
When they know that there's another to this issue,
they know that people like myself,
Incidentally let me myself.

How am I going to make a
I hope you find what you are for.
On the hand,
In fact, the importance of case is wether
or not can feel free to use work done by artists of
their own generation, or generations
as the basis for the of new work
It's something that has taken place in art,
from time and memorial, and continue to happen.
And if the courts say a work of art can have no basis
in a prior work of art, that would be a damaging and destructive
statement in to
the of art.

Oh, please sue us!