Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not I have anything against shoe salesmen,
but let me you something
See, I was born with a in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, Dead-Dog records. If it ain't a Dead-Dog, it barking.
How can I ya?

There are blank cassettes a year sold in this country,
and believe me, they're not being for dictation.
They're being used to copy records. is no expemption of copyright
for home taping, period, the consent of the owner.

What's on anyways?
What comes out of the is different
than goes in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most important things about the of tape
is that it changed music being an event in time,
being an event in space.

The between a copy and an original
...into being an in space.

I think it challanges we have about
the relationship between a copy and an

You can edit it, the songs.
And of course then it's played back,

You're in the same sense
In the same sense you're with any plastic material
And ofcourse, then when it's back,
it once again an event in time.

But that intrum
(I suppose)
But during that intrum period, where it's a thing,
you can do lots of with it.
Lots of things that you never had
to -, Prior to -, Prior to -,
The of tape.

It while (seeing) before anybody started
seeing the possibilities of
the possibilities of this

What's the power of reproducing
into our own heads?
That the old boundaries between what was my
And was yours
become confused.

Only a

And of making their own sounds
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do than you)

Only a

Old technologies get confused with new

I this confusing between original and copy,
and all the new technology use digital

A sound...
you to record something,
You
And put it into own music
So when you a certain key,
You
A sound from somebody recording

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
from else's recording
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it your own music.
else's recording.
A sound from else.

Ownership is
Destabilizes the older of distribution.

By the way, I don't know how times I've made
the obligatory to the U.S. Copyright Law

?'s law was written in 1924.
It was partially in 1988.
But the roots of the law 18th century

Just to put it in context, pre-radio, really,
it's pre-commercial-radio, pre-television,
it's pre-computer, it's geared, ah...
It's records, it's pre-compact-disk.
pre-almost everything we've come to look at
in life as communicating information.
One of the major of a legal system stuctured in this way
is that it does copyright law into disrespect, and it
bring law into disrespect. If one has a system which makes
common activities wrong in the of the law, and yet everybody
is doing it - then you begin to wonder - is law of respect?

(You something?)
Everything about it is
(You something?)
Everything the traffic will
(The people who listening)
No-way can you get happy feeling
(You and daughter)
you are stealing
(You don't need any of this. Just around.
Just ask around. Just see they're using tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of that of thing.
(The country what's happening. Look, oh)

I still stolen
I feel stolen
I still feel goods are stolen goods,
Let's go on the stealing...
But I can't really on it,
I keep feeling like,
but... but... but...
As long as you accept goods
As long as you accept an art form like goods
I suppose,
As long as you accept an art like Collage,
Where you take and newspaper clippings
and draw up on a board.

I say.
I say the people out there,
When they know that there's side to this issue,
When they know that like myself,
Incidentally let me myself.

How am I going to make a
I you find what you are looking for.
On the hand,
In fact, the of this case is wether
or not artists can feel to use work done by artists of
their own generation, or generations
as the for the creation of new work
It's again something that has place in art,
from time and memorial, and continue to happen.
And if the courts say that a work of art can have no
in a prior work of art, would be a very damaging and destructive
in relationship to
the of art.

Oh, please sue us!