Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not that I have anything against salesmen,
but let me you something
See, I was with a song in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, Dead-Dog records. If it a Dead-Dog, it ain't barking.
How can I ya?

There are fifty-million blank cassettes a sold in this country,
and believe me, they're not used for dictation.
They're being used to copy records. There is no expemption of
for home taping, period, without the of the owner.

What's going on
What out of the machine is different
than what in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most things about the invention of tape
is that it changed from being an event in time,
into being an in space.

The relationship between a copy and an
...into an event in space.

I think it notions we have about
the between a copy and an original

You can it, strech the songs.
And of course then when played back,

You're dealing in the sense
In the same sense dealing with any plastic material
And ofcourse, then when it's back,
it once again becomes an in time.

But during that
(I suppose)
But during that intrum period, it's a spacial thing,
you can do lots of things it.
Lots of that you never had available
to -, Prior to -, Prior to -,
The of tape.

It took (seeing) before anybody started
the possibilities of this
seeing the possibilities of

the power of reproducing information
back into our own
That the old boundaries what was my information
And what was
Have confused.

Only a

And instead of making own sounds
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do than you)

a sample

Old technologies get confused with new

I this confusing between original and copy,
and all the new technology use information

A sound...
you to record something,
You
And put it your own music
So when you a certain key,
You
A sound from somebody else's

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
from somebody recording
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it into own music.
else's recording.
A from somebody else.

is redefined
Destabilizes the system of distribution.

By the way, I don't how many times I've made
the obligatory to the U.S. Copyright Law

?'s copyright law was in 1924.
It was partially in 1988.
But the roots of the law 18th century

Just to put it in context, pre-radio, really,
pre-commercial-radio, it's pre-television,
it's pre-computer, it's geared, ah...
pre-modern records, it's pre-compact-disk.
It's pre-almost everything we've to look at
in modern life as information.
One of the criticizems of a legal system stuctured in this way
is that it bring copyright law into disrespect, and it
law generally into disrespect. If one has a system which makes
common activities wrong in the of the law, and yet everybody
is doing it - then you to wonder - is law worthy of respect?

(You something?)
Everything it is appealing
(You something?)
Everything the traffic allow
(The who were listening)
No-way can you get happy feeling
(You and daughter)
you are stealing
(You don't need any of this. look around.
Just ask around. Just see what they're using for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of type of thing.
(The knows what's happening. Look, oh)

I still stolen
I feel stolen
I feel stolen goods are stolen goods,
Let's go on the stealing...
But I really comment on it,
'cause I keep like,
but... but... but...
As long as you accept goods
As long as you accept an art form like goods
I suppose,
As as you accept an art form like Collage,
you take photographs and newspaper clippings
and them up on a board.

I say.
I say the people out there,
they know that there's another side to this issue,
When they that people like myself,
Incidentally let me myself.

How am I going to a living?
I hope you find you are looking for.
On the hand,
In fact, the importance of this case is
or not artists can feel free to use work done by of
own generation, or preceeding generations
as the for the creation of new work
It's again something that has place in art,
time and memorial, and will continue to happen.
And if the courts say that a of art can have no basis
in a prior work of art, that would be a very and destructive
in relationship to
the of art.

Oh, don't sue us!