Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not that I have anything against salesmen,
but let me you something
See, I was with a song in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, Dead-Dog records. If it a Dead-Dog, it ain't barking.
How can I ya?

There are blank cassettes a year sold in this country,
and believe me, not being used for dictation.
They're being used to copy records. There is no expemption of
for taping, period, without the consent of the owner.

going on anyways?
What out of the machine is different
what goes in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most important things about the of tape
is that it music from being an event in time,
being an event in space.

The relationship a copy and an original
...into an event in space.

I think it challanges we have about
the between a copy and an original

You can edit it, the songs.
And of course then it's played back,

You're dealing in the same
In the same sense you're with any plastic material
And ofcourse, then when played back,
it once again becomes an in time.

But that intrum
(I suppose)
But during that intrum period, where a spacial thing,
you can do of things with it.
Lots of that you never had available
Prior to -, to -, Prior to -,
The of tape.

It took while (seeing) anybody started
seeing the possibilities of
seeing the of this

the power of reproducing information
back into our own
That the old boundaries between what was my
And what was
become confused.

Only a

And of making their own sounds
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do than you)

Only a

Old technologies get confused with new

I this confusing between original and copy,
and all the new use digital information

A sound...
Allow you to something,
You
And put it into own music
So you press a certain key,
You
A from somebody else's recording

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
from else's recording
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it into own music.
Somebody recording.
A from somebody else.

is redefined
Destabilizes the older of distribution.

By the way, I don't how many times I've made
the obligatory refrence to the U.S. Law

?'s copyright law was in 1924.
It was ammended in 1988.
But the roots of the law back century

to put it in context, it's pre-radio, really,
it's pre-commercial-radio, pre-television,
it's certainly pre-computer, geared, ah...
It's pre-modern records, pre-compact-disk.
It's everything we've come to look at
in modern as communicating information.
One of the major criticizems of a legal system stuctured in way
is that it does bring copyright law disrespect, and it
bring law into disrespect. If one has a system which makes
activities wrong in the eyes of the law, and yet everybody
is doing it - then you begin to wonder - is law worthy of

(You something?)
Everything about it is
(You something?)
Everything the traffic will
(The people who listening)
No-way can you get that happy
(You and daughter)
you are stealing
(You need any of this. Just look around.
Just ask around. Just see what they're tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of type of thing.
(The country what's happening. Look, oh)

I still stolen
I still feel
I still feel stolen are stolen goods,
go on with the stealing...
But I can't comment on it,
I keep feeling like,
but... but... but...
As long as you accept goods
As long as you accept an art like stolen goods
I suppose,
As long as you accept an art like Collage,
Where you take and newspaper clippings
and draw up on a board.

I say.
I say the people out there,
When know that there's another side to this issue,
When they know that people myself,
let me interrupt myself.

How am I going to a living?
I hope you what you are looking for.
On the hand,
In fact, the importance of case is wether
or not artists can feel free to use work by artists of
their own generation, or preceeding
as the basis for the of new work
It's again something that has place in art,
from time and memorial, and continue to happen.
And if the say that a work of art can have no basis
in a prior work of art, would be a very damaging and destructive
in relationship to
the of art.

Oh, don't sue us!