Not that I have against shoe salesmen, but let me tell you See, I was born with a in my heart, not a shoe.
Hello, Dead-Dog records. If it ain't a Dead-Dog, it barking. How can I ya?
There are fifty-million blank cassettes a year sold in country, and believe me, they're not used for dictation. They're being used to copy records. There is no expemption of for taping, period, without the consent of the owner.
What's going on comes out of the machine is different than goes in.
The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.
The most important things about the of tape is that it changed music being an event in time, into being an in space.
The relationship a copy and an original ...into an event in space.
I it challanges notions we have about the relationship a copy and an original
You can edit it, the songs. And of course when it's played back, You're dealing in the sense In the same sense you're dealing with any material And ofcourse, then it's played back, it once again becomes an in time.
But that intrum (I suppose) But during that intrum period, where it's a thing, you can do lots of things it. Lots of things that you never had Prior to -, to -, Prior to -, The of tape.
It took (seeing) before anybody started the possibilities of this seeing the possibilities of
What's the of reproducing information back our own heads? That the old between what was my information And what was become confused.
Only a
And of making their own sounds (Anything you can do I can do I can do anything you)
a sample
Old technologies get with new ones
I this confusing between original and copy, and all the new technology use information
A sound... you to record something, You And put it into own music So when you a certain key, You A sound somebody else's recording
(No you Yes we can No you Yes we can No you Yes we can! Yes we can!)
And put it in Or it up A song... A song... A song... somebody else's recording (Ownership...) You hear a And put it your own music. else's recording. A sound somebody else.
Ownership is the older system of distribution.
By the way, I don't know how many I've made the obligatory to the U.S. Copyright Law
?'s law was written in 1924. It was ammended in 1988. But the roots of the law back century
to put it in context, it's pre-radio, really, it's pre-commercial-radio, pre-television, it's pre-computer, it's geared, ah... pre-modern records, it's pre-compact-disk. It's pre-almost everything come to look at in modern life as information. One of the major of a legal system stuctured in this way is that it does bring law into disrespect, and it bring law generally into disrespect. If one has a system makes common activities in the eyes of the law, and yet everybody is doing it - you begin to wonder - is law worthy of respect?
(You something?) Everything about it is (You something?) Everything the traffic will (The people who listening) No-way can you get happy feeling (You and daughter) you are stealing (You don't any of this. Just look around. Just ask around. Just see they're using tapes for. you are stealing... No, I'm not a fan of type of thing. (The country knows happening. Look, oh)
I still feel I still feel I feel stolen goods are stolen goods, Let's go on the stealing... But I can't really on it, 'cause I feeling like, but... but... but... As long as you stolem goods As long as you an art form like stolen goods I suppose, As long as you accept an art like Collage, you take photographs and newspaper clippings and them up on a board.
I say. I say that the out there, When know that there's another side to this issue, When they that people like myself, let me interrupt myself.
How am I to make a living? I hope you find you are looking for. On the hand, In fact, the of this case is wether or not artists can feel free to use work done by of their own generation, or generations as the basis for the creation of new It's again something that has place in art, from and memorial, and will continue to happen. And if the courts say that a of art can have no basis in a prior work of art, that would be a damaging and destructive statement in to the of art.
Oh, please sue us!