Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not that I have anything shoe salesmen,
but let me tell you
See, I was born a song in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, Dead-Dog records. If it ain't a Dead-Dog, it barking.
How can I ya?

are fifty-million blank cassettes a year sold in this country,
and me, they're not being used for dictation.
being used to copy records. There is no expemption of copyright
for home taping, period, the consent of the owner.

What's going on
comes out of the machine is different
than what in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most important things about the invention of
is that it changed from being an event in time,
being an event in space.

The relationship between a copy and an
...into an event in space.

I think it challanges we have about
the relationship between a copy and an

You can edit it, the songs.
And of course then it's played back,

You're dealing in the sense
In the same sense you're dealing with any material
And ofcourse, then when played back,
it once again an event in time.

But during that
(I suppose)
But during that intrum period, it's a spacial thing,
you can do lots of things it.
of things that you never had available
Prior to -, Prior to -, to -,
The of tape.

It took while (seeing) anybody started
seeing the of this
seeing the of this

What's the power of information
into our own heads?
That the old boundaries what was my information
And was yours
Have confused.

Only a

And of making their own sounds
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do than you)

Only a

Old get confused with new ones

I find this confusing original and copy,
and all the new technology use digital

A sound...
Allow you to something,
You
And put it your own music
So when you press a key,
You
A from somebody else's recording

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
from else's recording
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it your own music.
Somebody recording.
A from somebody else.

is redefined
Destabilizes the system of distribution.

By the way, I don't know how many times made
the refrence to the U.S. Copyright Law

?'s copyright law was in 1924.
It was partially in 1988.
But the roots of the law back century

to put it in context, it's pre-radio, really,
it's pre-commercial-radio, pre-television,
it's pre-computer, it's geared, ah...
It's records, it's pre-compact-disk.
pre-almost everything we've come to look at
in life as communicating information.
One of the major criticizems of a legal stuctured in this way
is that it bring copyright law into disrespect, and it
bring law generally disrespect. If one has a system which makes
common activities wrong in the of the law, and yet everybody
is it - then you begin to wonder - is law worthy of respect?

(You something?)
Everything about it is
(You something?)
Everything the traffic will
(The who were listening)
can you get that happy feeling
(You and daughter)
When you are
(You don't need any of this. look around.
ask around. Just see what they're using tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of type of thing.
(The country knows happening. Look, oh)

I feel stolen
I still feel
I still stolen goods are stolen goods,
go on with the stealing...
But I can't really on it,
'cause I keep like,
but... but... but...
As long as you accept stolem
As long as you an art form like stolen goods
I suppose,
As as you accept an art form like Collage,
Where you photographs and newspaper clippings
and them up on a board.

I say.
I say the people out there,
When they that there's another side to this issue,
When know that people like myself,
Incidentally let me myself.

How am I going to make a
I you find what you are looking for.
On the hand,
In fact, the of this case is wether
or not artists can free to use work done by artists of
own generation, or preceeding generations
as the basis for the of new work
It's again that has taken place in art,
time and memorial, and will continue to happen.
And if the say that a work of art can have no basis
in a prior of art, that would be a very damaging and destructive
statement in to
the of art.

Oh, don't sue us!