Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not I have anything against shoe salesmen,
but let me tell you
See, I was with a song in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, records. If it ain't a Dead-Dog, it ain't barking.
How can I ya?

There are fifty-million blank cassettes a sold in this country,
and me, they're not being used for dictation.
They're being used to copy records. There is no of copyright
for home taping, period, without the of the owner.

What's on anyways?
comes out of the machine is different
than what in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most important things the invention of tape
is that it music from being an event in time,
into an event in space.

The relationship between a and an original
...into being an in space.

I think it challanges notions we have
the relationship between a copy and an

You can edit it, the songs.
And of course when it's played back,

You're dealing in the sense
In the same sense you're with any plastic material
And ofcourse, then it's played back,
it once again becomes an in time.

But during that
(I suppose)
But during that intrum period, where a spacial thing,
you can do lots of with it.
Lots of that you never had available
to -, Prior to -, Prior to -,
The of tape.

It took while (seeing) before anybody
seeing the possibilities of
the possibilities of this

What's the power of reproducing
into our own heads?
That the old boundaries between what was my
And what was
Have confused.

a sample

And instead of making their own
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do anything you)

Only a

Old technologies get with new ones

I find this between original and copy,
and all the new technology use information

A sound...
Allow you to something,
You
And put it into your own
So when you press a key,
You
A sound from else's recording

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
somebody else's recording
(Ownership...)
You hear a
And put it your own music.
Somebody recording.
A sound from else.

is redefined
Destabilizes the older of distribution.

By the way, I don't know how many I've made
the refrence to the U.S. Copyright Law

?'s law was written in 1924.
It was partially in 1988.
But the of the law back 18th century

Just to put it in context, pre-radio, really,
it's pre-commercial-radio, pre-television,
it's pre-computer, it's geared, ah...
It's pre-modern records, pre-compact-disk.
It's everything we've come to look at
in modern life as information.
One of the major criticizems of a legal system stuctured in way
is that it does copyright law into disrespect, and it
law generally into disrespect. If one has a system which makes
common activities wrong in the eyes of the law, and yet
is doing it - then you begin to wonder - is law worthy of

(You something?)
Everything about it is
(You something?)
Everything the will allow
(The people who listening)
No-way can you get that happy
(You and daughter)
When you are
(You need any of this. Just look around.
Just ask around. Just see what using tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of that of thing.
(The country what's happening. Look, oh)

I feel stolen
I feel stolen
I still feel goods are stolen goods,
Let's go on the stealing...
But I can't comment on it,
'cause I keep like,
but... but... but...
As long as you accept stolem
As long as you accept an art form like stolen
I suppose,
As long as you an art form like Collage,
you take photographs and newspaper clippings
and draw up on a board.

I say.
I say the people out there,
When they know that there's another side to issue,
When they know people like myself,
let me interrupt myself.

How am I going to a living?
I hope you what you are looking for.
On the hand,
In fact, the importance of case is wether
or not artists can feel free to use done by artists of
own generation, or preceeding generations
as the for the creation of new work
It's something that has taken place in art,
time and memorial, and will continue to happen.
And if the courts say a work of art can have no basis
in a prior of art, that would be a very damaging and destructive
statement in to
the of art.

Oh, don't sue us!