Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not I have anything against shoe salesmen,
but let me you something
See, I was with a song in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, Dead-Dog records. If it ain't a Dead-Dog, it barking.
How can I ya?

There are fifty-million blank cassettes a sold in this country,
and believe me, not being used for dictation.
They're used to copy records. There is no expemption of copyright
for home taping, period, the consent of the owner.

going on anyways?
What comes out of the is different
than goes in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most important things about the invention of
is that it changed music from being an in time,
being an event in space.

The relationship a copy and an original
...into an event in space.

I think it challanges notions we about
the relationship between a and an original

You can edit it, the songs.
And of course then it's played back,

You're dealing in the same
In the same you're dealing with any plastic material
And ofcourse, then it's played back,
it once again an event in time.

But during intrum
(I suppose)
But during that intrum period, where a spacial thing,
you can do lots of things it.
of things that you never had available
Prior to -, Prior to -, to -,
The of tape.

It took while (seeing) before started
the possibilities of this
seeing the possibilities of

the power of reproducing information
back our own heads?
That the old between what was my information
And what was
become confused.

Only a

And instead of their own sounds
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do than you)

Only a

Old get confused with new ones

I find confusing between original and copy,
and all the new technology use digital

A sound...
you to record something,
You
And put it your own music
So you press a certain key,
You
A sound from somebody recording

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
from somebody else's
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it your own music.
else's recording.
A sound somebody else.

Ownership is
Destabilizes the older of distribution.

By the way, I don't how many times I've made
the obligatory to the U.S. Copyright Law

?'s copyright law was in 1924.
It was ammended in 1988.
But the roots of the law back century

Just to put it in context, pre-radio, really,
it's pre-commercial-radio, pre-television,
it's pre-computer, it's geared, ah...
pre-modern records, it's pre-compact-disk.
It's everything we've come to look at
in modern life as information.
One of the major criticizems of a legal system stuctured in way
is that it bring copyright law into disrespect, and it
bring law generally into disrespect. If one has a system which
common activities wrong in the eyes of the law, and yet
is doing it - then you begin to wonder - is law of respect?

(You something?)
Everything about it is
(You something?)
Everything the traffic allow
(The who were listening)
No-way can you get that happy
(You and daughter)
When you are
(You don't any of this. Just look around.
ask around. Just see what they're using tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of that of thing.
(The country knows happening. Look, oh)

I still stolen
I still feel
I still feel stolen are stolen goods,
Let's go on the stealing...
But I can't comment on it,
I keep feeling like,
but... but... but...
As long as you accept stolem
As long as you accept an art form stolen goods
I suppose,
As as you accept an art form like Collage,
Where you take photographs and clippings
and draw up on a board.

I say.
I say the people out there,
When they know that there's another side to issue,
they know that people like myself,
Incidentally let me myself.

How am I going to make a
I you find what you are looking for.
On the hand,
In fact, the of this case is wether
or not artists can feel free to use work done by of
their own generation, or generations
as the for the creation of new work
again something that has taken place in art,
from time and memorial, and will to happen.
And if the courts say that a of art can have no basis
in a work of art, that would be a very damaging and destructive
statement in to
the of art.

Oh, don't sue us!