Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not that I have anything shoe salesmen,
but let me tell you
See, I was born with a in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, records. If it ain't a Dead-Dog, it ain't barking.
How can I ya?

There are fifty-million blank cassettes a year in this country,
and me, they're not being used for dictation.
being used to copy records. There is no expemption of copyright
for home taping, period, without the of the owner.

What's going on
What comes out of the is different
what goes in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most important things about the of tape
is it changed music from being an event in time,
being an event in space.

The between a copy and an original
...into being an in space.

I think it notions we have about
the between a copy and an original

You can edit it, the songs.
And of course then when played back,

You're dealing in the sense
In the same you're dealing with any plastic material
And ofcourse, then when it's back,
it once again becomes an in time.

But during that
(I suppose)
But that intrum period, where it's a spacial thing,
you can do lots of things it.
of things that you never had available
Prior to -, to -, Prior to -,
The of tape.

It took while (seeing) before anybody
seeing the possibilities of
seeing the possibilities of

What's the power of information
into our own heads?
That the old boundaries between what was my
And was yours
become confused.

Only a

And of making their own sounds
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do anything you)

a sample

Old technologies get confused new ones

I find this confusing between and copy,
and all the new technology use digital

A sound...
you to record something,
You
And put it into own music
So you press a certain key,
You
A sound from else's recording

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
somebody else's recording
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it into own music.
else's recording.
A sound from else.

is redefined
Destabilizes the system of distribution.

By the way, I don't know how times I've made
the refrence to the U.S. Copyright Law

?'s copyright law was in 1924.
It was ammended in 1988.
But the roots of the law 18th century

Just to put it in context, pre-radio, really,
it's pre-commercial-radio, pre-television,
it's pre-computer, it's geared, ah...
It's pre-modern records, pre-compact-disk.
It's pre-almost everything we've come to at
in life as communicating information.
One of the major criticizems of a legal stuctured in this way
is that it does bring law into disrespect, and it
bring law generally into disrespect. If one has a system makes
activities wrong in the eyes of the law, and yet everybody
is doing it - then you to wonder - is law worthy of respect?

(You something?)
Everything about it is
(You something?)
the traffic will allow
(The who were listening)
No-way can you get happy feeling
(You and daughter)
you are stealing
(You don't any of this. Just look around.
Just ask around. Just see what using tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of that of thing.
(The knows what's happening. Look, oh)

I still stolen
I feel stolen
I still feel goods are stolen goods,
go on with the stealing...
But I really comment on it,
'cause I keep like,
but... but... but...
As long as you accept stolem
As long as you accept an art like stolen goods
I suppose,
As long as you an art form like Collage,
Where you photographs and newspaper clippings
and draw up on a board.

I say.
I say the people out there,
When they know that there's another to this issue,
When they know that like myself,
Incidentally let me myself.

How am I going to make a
I hope you what you are looking for.
On the hand,
In fact, the importance of case is wether
or not artists can feel free to use done by artists of
their own generation, or preceeding
as the basis for the of new work
It's again something that has taken in art,
time and memorial, and will continue to happen.
And if the courts say that a of art can have no basis
in a prior work of art, that would be a damaging and destructive
in relationship to
the of art.

Oh, please sue us!