Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not that I have against shoe salesmen,
but let me tell you
See, I was born with a in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, Dead-Dog records. If it a Dead-Dog, it ain't barking.
How can I ya?

There are fifty-million blank cassettes a year sold in country,
and believe me, they're not being for dictation.
They're being used to copy records. There is no of copyright
for taping, period, without the consent of the owner.

going on anyways?
What out of the machine is different
than what in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most important about the invention of tape
is that it changed music from an event in time,
into being an in space.

The relationship between a copy and an
...into being an in space.

I think it challanges notions we have
the relationship a copy and an original

You can edit it, the songs.
And of course when it's played back,

You're dealing in the sense
In the sense you're dealing with any plastic material
And ofcourse, when it's played back,
it once again becomes an in time.

But during that
(I suppose)
But during intrum period, where it's a spacial thing,
you can do lots of with it.
Lots of that you never had available
Prior to -, Prior to -, to -,
The of tape.

It took while (seeing) anybody started
the possibilities of this
seeing the possibilities of

What's the power of reproducing
back into our own
That the old boundaries between what was my
And was yours
Have confused.

Only a

And of making their own sounds
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do anything you)

a sample

Old get confused with new ones

I find this confusing original and copy,
and all the new use digital information

A sound...
Allow you to something,
You
And put it into your own
So you press a certain key,
You
A sound somebody else's recording

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
from else's recording
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it into own music.
else's recording.
A from somebody else.

Ownership is
Destabilizes the older of distribution.

By the way, I don't know how many times I've
the refrence to the U.S. Copyright Law

?'s copyright law was in 1924.
It was partially in 1988.
But the roots of the law back 18th

Just to put it in context, pre-radio, really,
pre-commercial-radio, it's pre-television,
it's pre-computer, it's geared, ah...
It's pre-modern records, pre-compact-disk.
It's pre-almost everything we've to look at
in modern life as information.
One of the criticizems of a legal system stuctured in this way
is it does bring copyright law into disrespect, and it
bring law generally into disrespect. If one has a system makes
common activities wrong in the of the law, and yet everybody
is doing it - then you begin to wonder - is law of respect?

(You something?)
about it is appealing
(You something?)
Everything the will allow
(The people who listening)
No-way can you get that happy
(You and daughter)
you are stealing
(You need any of this. Just look around.
ask around. Just see what they're using tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of type of thing.
(The country knows happening. Look, oh)

I still feel
I still feel
I still feel goods are stolen goods,
Let's go on the stealing...
But I can't comment on it,
'cause I keep like,
but... but... but...
As as you accept stolem goods
As long as you accept an art form stolen goods
I suppose,
As as you accept an art form like Collage,
Where you take photographs and clippings
and draw up on a board.

I say.
I say the people out there,
When know that there's another side to this issue,
When they know that like myself,
let me interrupt myself.

How am I going to a living?
I hope you find what you are for.
On the hand,
In fact, the importance of this case is
or not artists can feel free to use done by artists of
own generation, or preceeding generations
as the basis for the creation of new
It's again something that has taken in art,
from time and memorial, and continue to happen.
And if the courts say that a work of art can no basis
in a prior work of art, that would be a very and destructive
in relationship to
the of art.

Oh, please sue us!