Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not I have anything against shoe salesmen,
but let me you something
See, I was born with a in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, Dead-Dog records. If it ain't a Dead-Dog, it barking.
How can I ya?

are fifty-million blank cassettes a year sold in this country,
and believe me, they're not being for dictation.
being used to copy records. There is no expemption of copyright
for home taping, period, the consent of the owner.

What's on anyways?
comes out of the machine is different
than what in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most important things the invention of tape
is it changed music from being an event in time,
into an event in space.

The between a copy and an original
...into being an in space.

I think it challanges notions we have
the relationship between a and an original

You can edit it, the songs.
And of course then it's played back,

You're dealing in the same
In the same sense you're dealing with any material
And ofcourse, then when it's back,
it once again becomes an in time.

But during intrum
(I suppose)
But during that intrum period, where a spacial thing,
you can do of things with it.
Lots of things you never had available
to -, Prior to -, Prior to -,
The of tape.

It while (seeing) before anybody started
the possibilities of this
seeing the of this

What's the power of reproducing
into our own heads?
That the old between what was my information
And what was
become confused.

Only a

And instead of making own sounds
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do anything you)

a sample

Old technologies get confused new ones

I find this between original and copy,
and all the new use digital information

A sound...
Allow you to something,
You
And put it into your own
So you press a certain key,
You
A sound from else's recording

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
somebody else's recording
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it your own music.
Somebody recording.
A sound from else.

is redefined
Destabilizes the system of distribution.

By the way, I don't know how many I've made
the obligatory refrence to the U.S. Law

?'s law was written in 1924.
It was ammended in 1988.
But the roots of the law back 18th

Just to put it in context, pre-radio, really,
pre-commercial-radio, it's pre-television,
it's pre-computer, it's geared, ah...
It's records, it's pre-compact-disk.
It's pre-almost we've come to look at
in modern life as information.
One of the major criticizems of a legal system stuctured in way
is that it does bring law into disrespect, and it
law generally into disrespect. If one has a system which makes
common activities wrong in the of the law, and yet everybody
is doing it - you begin to wonder - is law worthy of respect?

(You something?)
Everything it is appealing
(You something?)
the traffic will allow
(The people who listening)
No-way can you get that feeling
(You and daughter)
you are stealing
(You need any of this. Just look around.
Just ask around. Just see they're using tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of that of thing.
(The country knows happening. Look, oh)

I feel stolen
I still stolen
I still feel stolen are stolen goods,
Let's go on the stealing...
But I really comment on it,
I keep feeling like,
but... but... but...
As as you accept stolem goods
As long as you accept an art form stolen goods
I suppose,
As long as you accept an art like Collage,
Where you take photographs and newspaper
and draw up on a board.

I say.
I say the people out there,
When they know that another side to this issue,
they know that people like myself,
Incidentally let me myself.

How am I going to make a
I you find what you are looking for.
On the hand,
In fact, the importance of this is wether
or not artists can feel free to use work by artists of
own generation, or preceeding generations
as the for the creation of new work
It's again something has taken place in art,
from time and memorial, and continue to happen.
And if the say that a work of art can have no basis
in a prior work of art, that would be a very damaging and
statement in to
the of art.

Oh, please sue us!