Luyện nghe bài hát Only a Sample

Not that I anything against shoe salesmen,
but let me you something
See, I was born with a in my heart, not a shoe.

Hello, Dead-Dog records. If it a Dead-Dog, it ain't barking.
How can I ya?

There are fifty-million blank cassettes a sold in this country,
and me, they're not being used for dictation.
being used to copy records. There is no expemption of copyright
for home taping, period, without the of the owner.

What's going on
comes out of the machine is different
than what in.

The new tech, the new tech, the new technology.

The most important things about the of tape
is that it changed music being an event in time,
into an event in space.

The relationship between a and an original
...into an event in space.

I it challanges notions we have about
the relationship between a and an original

You can it, strech the songs.
And of course then when played back,

You're dealing in the same
In the same you're dealing with any plastic material
And ofcourse, then when played back,
it again becomes an event in time.

But during intrum
(I suppose)
But during that intrum period, where a spacial thing,
you can do of things with it.
Lots of that you never had available
to -, Prior to -, Prior to -,
The of tape.

It took while (seeing) before started
seeing the of this
seeing the of this

the power of reproducing information
back our own heads?
That the old boundaries between what was my
And what was
Have confused.

Only a

And instead of making own sounds
(Anything you can do
I can do
I can do anything you)

a sample

Old technologies get confused with new

I find this confusing original and copy,
and all the new technology use information

A sound...
you to record something,
You
And put it into own music
So you press a certain key,
You
A sound from somebody else's

(No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can
No you
Yes we can!
Yes we can!)

And put it in
Or it up
A song... A song... A song...
from else's recording
(Ownership...)
You a song
And put it your own music.
else's recording.
A sound somebody else.

Ownership is
the older system of distribution.

By the way, I know how many times I've made
the refrence to the U.S. Copyright Law

?'s copyright law was in 1924.
It was partially in 1988.
But the of the law back 18th century

to put it in context, it's pre-radio, really,
it's pre-commercial-radio, pre-television,
it's certainly pre-computer, geared, ah...
It's pre-modern records, pre-compact-disk.
It's pre-almost everything we've come to at
in modern life as information.
One of the major criticizems of a legal stuctured in this way
is that it does copyright law into disrespect, and it
bring law generally disrespect. If one has a system which makes
common activities in the eyes of the law, and yet everybody
is it - then you begin to wonder - is law worthy of respect?

(You something?)
about it is appealing
(You something?)
Everything the traffic allow
(The people who listening)
No-way can you get happy feeling
(You and daughter)
you are stealing
(You don't any of this. Just look around.
Just ask around. Just see what using tapes for.
you are stealing...
No, I'm not a fan of that of thing.
(The country knows happening. Look, oh)

I still feel
I feel stolen
I still feel goods are stolen goods,
Let's go on the stealing...
But I can't comment on it,
'cause I keep like,
but... but... but...
As long as you stolem goods
As long as you an art form like stolen goods
I suppose,
As long as you accept an art like Collage,
Where you take and newspaper clippings
and draw up on a board.

I say.
I say the people out there,
When know that there's another side to this issue,
they know that people like myself,
Incidentally let me myself.

How am I going to make a
I hope you what you are looking for.
On the hand,
In fact, the importance of case is wether
or not artists can feel to use work done by artists of
their own generation, or preceeding
as the for the creation of new work
It's again something that has taken in art,
time and memorial, and will continue to happen.
And if the courts say a work of art can have no basis
in a prior work of art, that would be a very and destructive
statement in to
the of art.

Oh, don't sue us!